Concurrent Mucosal Melanoma and Angiofibroma of the Nose

Article information

Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;9(3):278-281
Publication date (electronic) : 2016 April 20
doi : https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2015.01333
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery,The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Pathology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Corresponding author: Joohyung Lee, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, 64 Daeheung-ro, Jung-gu, Daejeon 34943, Korea Tel: +82-42-220-9580, Fax: +82-42-221-9580, E-mail: fpsljh@gmail.com
Received 2015 August 26; Revised 2015 November 24; Accepted 2015 December 8.

Abstract

Malignant melanoma rarely develops in the paranasal sinuses, and generally has a poor prognosis. However, mucosal melanoma can masquerade both clinically and histopathologically as a benign lesion, rendering accurate early diagnosis difficult. On the other hand, angiofibroma, a benign tumor, is more easily diagnosed than a mucosal melanoma, because the former exhibits specific histopathological features. No cases of concurrent angiofibroma and mucosal melanoma have been reported to date. We describe such a case below.

INTRODUCTION

Mucosal melanoma is a malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. Histiopathologically, mucosal melanoma often presents with epidermal hyperplasia, vascularization, hemorrhage, and/or fibrosis, while melanin may be present or absent. Furthermore, clinical symptoms are nonspecific. Therefore, mucosal melanoma can masquerade both clinically and histopathologically as a benign lesion. Hence, it is difficult to reach an early diagnosis of musosal melanoma.

On the other hand, angiofibroma, a benign tumor, is more readily diagnosed than mucosal melanoma because the histopathological findings are specific, including many extensively dilated vascular channels. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reported cases of concurrent angiofibroma and mucosal melanoma. We report a case of mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity with concurrent angiofibroma.

CASE REPORT

A 59-year-old female was admitted to the ear, nose, and throat clinic of Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital in December 2013 complaining of nasal stuffiness and intermittent epistaxis from the right nasal cavity over the past year. She had no systemic disease and no relevant medical or family history. On physical examination, rhinoscopy revealed a polypoid mass in the right nasal cavity, which bled when lightly touched (Fig. 1). A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a dense soft tissue mass in the right paranasal sinuses and the right nasal cavity (Fig. 2). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an enhanced right antral mass (3.2 cm × 2.5 cm × 2.2 cm in size) with a widened maxillary ostium that extended to the right nasal cavity (Fig. 3). The patient underwent endoscopic sinus surgery; however, the mass bled profusely and only a portion was removed for biopsy. Surgery was terminated after the bleeding was controlled. Because of such bleeding tendency, angiography accompanied by tumor embolization was performed prior to reoperation (Fig. 4). The pathologic report of specimen from primary uncompleted operation pointed to a case of the angiofibroma, which was consistent with the patient’s clinical features. And we considered right endoscopic medial maxillectomy at revision operation.

Fig. 1.

Preoperative endoscopic fi ndings in the right nasal cavity. S, septum; IT, inferior turbinate; T, tumor.

Fig. 2.

Computed tomography reveals dense soft tissue in the right maxillary sinus and right nasal cavity. (A) Axial, (B) coronal images.

Fig. 3.

Paranasal sinus magnetic resonance imaging fi ndings. An enhanced right antral mass with a widened maxillary ostium is evident; it extends into the right nasal cavity axial T2-weighted (A), axial T1-weighted (B), and coronal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (C) images.

Fig. 4.

Angiography with tumor embolization. The tumor was supplied by nasal branch of right sphenopalatine artery. (A) Before embolization, (B) after embolization.

In the revision operation the tumor mass was found to be dark greenish and yellowish fragile, filling middle meatus and extending to the nasal cavity. Bleeding was not severe due to the embolization. Its medial extent was to the nasal septum, lateral to the lateral wall of maxillary sinus, superior to middle of the ethmoid sinus, inferior to the inferior maxillary wall, anterior to the anterior maxillary wall, and posterior to the nasopharynx. The origin of the tumor was deduced to be the lateral wall of the nasal cavity near the middle meatus. Furthermore, a large part of the tumor was not adherent to the adjacent sinus wall except around the middle meatus.

The final pathology was confirmed to be mucosal melanoma with concurrent angiofibroma. Excised masses were composed of angiofibroma components, which contained thin walled blood vessels and fibrous stroma and mucosal melanoma components, which contained hyperpigmentation in subepithelium on pathologic examination (Fig. 5AC).

Fig. 5.

(A) Mucosal melanoma with an angiofi broma. Mucosal hyperpigmentation in subepithelium showing admixture of thin walled blood vessels and fi brous stroma (H&E: a, ×40; b, ×100). (B) The angiofi broma lesion of the specimen. Nasal mucosa with fi broblastic stroma and thin walled blood vessels (H&E, ×40). (C) Mucosal melanoma with intracytoplasmic melanic pigment (H&E: a, ×100; b, ×400). (D) Tumor cells positive for Melan-A (×40).

The patient was discharged with no complications, and we scheduled positron emission tomography (PET) CT and consultations with medical and radiation oncologists. PET CT yielded no evidence of a remnant tumor or distant metastasis. The patient underwent adjuvant radiation therapy with immunotherapy (interferon-α) for 1 year, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the right paranasal sinus (5,000 cGy/25 fractions).

DISCUSSION

Melanomas usually arise from melanocytes, which are in turn derived from the neuroectoderm of the basal layers of the skin. They develop more rarely in mucosal membranes [1]. Melanomas of the nasal cavity or paranasal sinuses are rarer than cutaneous melanomas; the former tumors constitute 3.6%–4% of all nasal cancers. Mucosal melanomas in the head-and-neck region account for half of all mucosal melanomas. Apart from the head-and-neck region, they can arise in the genital organs of females or the anorectal and urinary tracts, and are far more aggressive with poorer prognoses than cutaneous melanomas [2]. The 5-year survival rate is 10%–40% and the median survival time is 21–24 months [3]. Such poor prognoses are attributable to both local recurrence and metastasis [4]. Furthermore, primary mucosal melanomas are often misdiagnosed due to their anatomical locations and the lack of discernible signs and symptoms. Epistaxis and nasal obstruction are common symptoms in both mucosal melanoma and nasal benign tumors. CT is used to evaluate the primary tumor and cervical lymph nodes, whereas MRI is employed to explore the extent of sinonasal tumors, particularly those that may involve the skull base and/or exhibit neurotropic spread [5]. Also, mucosal melanoma may either contain or lack melanin, while exhibiting microscopic findings such as epidermal hyperplasia, vascularization, hemorrhage, and/or fibrosis [6]. Immunohistochemical staining may be useful to distinguish melanomas from other malignancies. Melanomas are likely to be positive for HMB-45, Melan-A, S-100 protein, Mart-1, and tyrosinase [2].

The primary treatment modality is surgical resection with wide margins since incomplete resection is associated with poor survival rate [7]. In addition, postoperative radiotherapy should be considered for most cases because of the high risk of local recurrence even after apparently complete resection. Even patients with relatively localized tumors should be considered for such therapy [5]. Chemotherapy is prescribed when a distant metastasis and/or recurrence is/are evident; immunotherapy (Bacillus Calmette–Guérin or interferon) remains unreliable.

This is the first English-language report to describe a concurrent mucosal melanoma and angiofibroma. Our patient tended to bleed easily, a clinical sign of an angiofibroma. Moreover, the biopsy sample included angiofibroma tissue, leading the pathologist to diagnose melanocytes as hemosiderin-laden macrophages (Fig. 5A, B). The mucosal melanoma was ultimately diagnosed via Melan-A staining (Fig. 5D).

In conclusion, mucosal malignant melanomas are very rare, often presenting with atypical symptoms and masquerading both clinically and histologically as benign lesions. When a mucosal melanoma and a benign sinusoidal tumor, such as angiofibroma occur together, accurate diagnosis is difficult. Even if a benign sinusoidal tumor is suspected, careful examination is required. Immunohistochemical staining is required if there is even the slightest suspicion of a mucosal melanoma.

HIGHLIGHTS

▪ This case suggested possibility of coexistence of mucosal melanoma and hemangioma in the nasal cavity neoplasm.

▪ Malignant condition should be considered in easily bleeding masses in the nasal cavity as of its differential diagonosis.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Medhi P, Biswas M, Das D, Amed S. Cytodiagnosis of mucosal malignant melanoma of nasal cavity: A case report with review of literature. J Cytol 2012;Jul. 29(3):208–10.
2. Mihajlovic M, Vlajkovic S, Jovanovic P, Stefanovic V. Primary mucosal melanomas: a comprehensive review. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2012;Oct. 5(8):739–53.
3. Mundra RK, Sikdar A. Endoscopic removal of malignant melanoma of the nasal cavity. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;Oct. 57(4):341–3.
4. Rinaldo A, Shaha AR, Patel SG, Ferlito A. Primary mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Acta Otolaryngol 2001;Dec. 121(8):979–82.
5. Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Hinerman RW, Werning JW, Villaret DB, Mendenhall NP. Head and neck mucosal melanoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2005;Dec. 28(6):626–30.
6. Grant-Kels JM, Bason ET, Grin CM. The misdiagnosis of malignant melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;Apr. 40(4):539–48.
7. Clifton N, Harrison L, Bradley PJ, Jones NS. Malignant melanoma of nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: report of 24 patients and literature review. J Laryngol Otol 2011;May. 125(5):479–85.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Preoperative endoscopic fi ndings in the right nasal cavity. S, septum; IT, inferior turbinate; T, tumor.

Fig. 2.

Computed tomography reveals dense soft tissue in the right maxillary sinus and right nasal cavity. (A) Axial, (B) coronal images.

Fig. 3.

Paranasal sinus magnetic resonance imaging fi ndings. An enhanced right antral mass with a widened maxillary ostium is evident; it extends into the right nasal cavity axial T2-weighted (A), axial T1-weighted (B), and coronal gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (C) images.

Fig. 4.

Angiography with tumor embolization. The tumor was supplied by nasal branch of right sphenopalatine artery. (A) Before embolization, (B) after embolization.

Fig. 5.

(A) Mucosal melanoma with an angiofi broma. Mucosal hyperpigmentation in subepithelium showing admixture of thin walled blood vessels and fi brous stroma (H&E: a, ×40; b, ×100). (B) The angiofi broma lesion of the specimen. Nasal mucosa with fi broblastic stroma and thin walled blood vessels (H&E, ×40). (C) Mucosal melanoma with intracytoplasmic melanic pigment (H&E: a, ×100; b, ×400). (D) Tumor cells positive for Melan-A (×40).